Gilbert v. Faircloth

117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 388, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 75
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1923
DocketNo. 3318
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 117 S.E. 246 (Gilbert v. Faircloth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Faircloth, 117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 388, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 75 (Ga. 1923).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. A ground of a motion ■ for a new trial complaining of the admission or rejection of evidence must be complete in itself or in connection with exhibits attached to the motion. The Supreme Court will not look to any other part of the record to make perfect an incomplete assignment of error in a motion for a new trial. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MeClifford, 120 Ga. 90 (47 S. E. 590). ., The foregoing principle applying to several of the assignments of error, they will not be considered.

2. In such assignments of error as are properly presented there is no material error in any of the rulings of the court; and the court did not err in the instructions of which complaint is made. The evidence warranted the verdict, and it was not error to overrule the mo-

tion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All of the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Kendrick
135 S.E. 721 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Horn v. Towson
135 S.E. 487 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 388, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-faircloth-ga-1923.