Gilbert v. Erie Building Ass'n

39 A. 291, 184 Pa. 554, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 936
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 7, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 346·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The power of attorney on the back of the certificate signed by the plaintiff was in the usual general terms of such instruments, and contained no restrictions, qualifications or conditions. It contained a full power of sale, and certainly authorized a sale of the certificate by any attorney who had it in his lawful custody. The defendant was an innocent pledgee of the certificate, and was perfectly at liberty to advance money upon it, and take it as collateral, divested of all claims on the part of the owner. Under all the authorities a transfer executed in such circumstances confers a good title upon the person buying it or advancing money upon it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. Erie Building Ass'n, 39 A. 291, 184 Pa. 554, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 936 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 291 (Gilbert v. Erie Building Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Costlow
36 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Colonial Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.
90 A. 189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Bannon v. Bank
14 Pa. Super. 566 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)