Gilbert v. Eigner

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 24, 1914
DocketNo. 13965
StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Gilbert v. Eigner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilbert v. Eigner, 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Ohio 1914).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; upon the first error assigned by the circuit court for reversal of the judgment, to-wit: That “the court erred in sustaining questions propounded to Peter W. Eigner, as follows : What do you say as to what the usual, ordinary commission is for the sale of secondhand electric machines?’ and also, What would you say it was?’ ” This court finds from the record that no other error intervened in the trial of said cause in the common pleas court.

Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-eigner-ohio-1914.