Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

Federal Circuit

Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 2012

Docket2012-7006

StatusUnpublished

This text of Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit RONALD D. GILBERT, Claimant-Appellant, ' V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, -. Respon,dent-Appellee. 2012-70o6 ` Appea1 from the United States Court of Appea1s for Veterans C1aims in case no. 10-0705, Judge Lawrence B. Hage1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Rona1d D. Gi1bert’s motion for an extension of time to obtain counsel, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that Gi1bert’s ini~ tia1 brief is due within 60 days of the date of E1ing of this order. No further extensions should be anticipated.

o1LBERT v. nvA 2 FoR THE CoURT FEB 0 7 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Rona1d D. Gi1bert (Informa1 BI'ief Form Enc1osed) K. E1izabeth WitWer, Esq. s21 FlLED U.S. COUHT 0F APPEALS FOR 11-lE FEDERAL C|RCUlT FEB 0 7 2012 JAN l~|0RBAl.Y .CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit RONALD D. GILBERT, Claimant-Appellant, ' V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, -. Respon,dent-Appellee. 2012-70o6 ` Appea1 from the United States Court of Appea1s for Veterans C1aims in case no. 10-0705, Judge Lawrence B. Hage1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Rona1d D. Gi1bert’s motion for an extension of time to obtain counsel, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that Gi1bert’s ini~ tia1 brief is due within 60 days of the date of E1ing of this order. No further extensions should be anticipated.

o1LBERT v. nvA 2 FoR THE CoURT FEB 0 7 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Rona1d D. Gi1bert (Informa1 BI'ief Form Enc1osed) K. E1izabeth WitWer, Esq. s21 FlLED U.S. COUHT 0F APPEALS FOR 11-lE FEDERAL C|RCUlT FEB 0 7 2012 JAN l~|0RBAl.Y .CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gilbert v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-dept-of-veterans-affairs-cafc-2012.