Gilbert v. City of Opp.
This text of 554 So. 2d 498 (Gilbert v. City of Opp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s attorney has failed to file a brief with this Court. The appellant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right. Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 105 S.Ct. 830, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Sandifer v. State, 535 So.2d 203, 205 (Ala.Cr.App.1987); Poe v. State, 510 So.2d 852 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). This case is therefore due to be remanded to the trial court for appointment of different counsel to represent the appellant.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 So. 2d 498, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 754, 1989 WL 140705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-city-of-opp-alacrimapp-1989.