Gilbert v. City of Boston

31 N.E. 734, 139 Mass. 313, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 93
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 11, 1885·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Field, J.

The nature of the defect was not such that the court can say, as matter of law, that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care in attempting to pass over it. Dewire v. Bailey, 131 Mass. 169. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert v. City of Boston, 31 N.E. 734, 139 Mass. 313, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 93 (Mass. 1885).

31 N.E. 734 (Gilbert v. City of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Silvertown v. Harcourt
179 S.E. 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Frost v. McCarthy
86 N.E. 918 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Russell v. Town of Monroe
116 N.C. 720 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Russell v. . Monroe
21 S.E. 550 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.
29 N.E. 464 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Osborne v. City of Detroit
32 F. 36 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1886)