Gilbert v. Castrejon

Opinion

TMaOnOyRa EE L. AMWo oFrIeR,M S,B PN.C 2. 06683 300 South First Street, Suite 342 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff, Darren Gilbert

DARREN GILBERT, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-00319-SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ) CLOSE THE CASE GABRIEL CASTREJON dba EL ) MARISQUERO, et al.; ) ) (Doc. 54) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) )

20 1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, Gabriel Castrejon dba El Marisquero, Ignacio Castrejon Alvarez dba El Marisquero, and Guaranty Holdings of California, Inc. (collectively “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), this action be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the Parties that the Court shall expressly retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of adjudicating any subsequent motion Plaintiff

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER may bring to recover his attorneys’ fees and costs (“Fees Motion”). Any Fees Motion shall be filed within 60 days of the date the Court issues its Order on this stipulation. Dated: November 7, 2023 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Darren Gilbert

Dated: November 7, 2023 MICHAEL S. WARDA, a Professional Law Corporation /s/ Michael S. Warda Michael S. Warda Attorney for Defendants, Gabriel Castrejon dba El Marisquero, Ignacio Castrejon Alvarez dba El Marisquero, and Guaranty Holdings of California, Inc.

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER On November 7, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 54). In light of the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, Gabriel Castrejon dba El Marisquero, Ignacio Castrejon Alvarez dba El Marisquero, and Guaranty Holdings of California, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) shall comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Release in Full, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. 2. By consent of Plaintiff and Defendants, the Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of adjudicating any motion by Plaintiff to recover his attorneys’ fees and costs (“Fees Motion”) until February 6, 2024. Plaintiff shall file any Fees Motion within 60 days of the date of this Order. 3. Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

Dated: November 8, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER