Gilbert v. Byars
This text of 590 F. App'x 279 (Gilbert v. Byars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[280]*280Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bobby Gilbert appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) claims without prejudice for failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gilbert v. Byars, No. 2:13-cv-02163-MGL, 2014 WL 4063020 (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
590 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-v-byars-ca4-2015.