Gilbert Santos Garcia Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 1, 2013·No. 13-13-00174-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-13-00174-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

GILBERT SANTOS GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 26th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez, and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant’s counsel, Alison Fox Dahlberg, has filed a motion requesting to

withdraw as counsel. According to her motion to withdraw, good cause exists for her to

withdraw because she has accepted employment with the Court of Criminal Appeals in

Austin, Texas. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall

further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 1st day of October, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert Santos Garcia Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Gilbert Santos Garcia Jr. v. State (Gilbert Santos Garcia Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)