Gilbert Rivera v. State
This text of Gilbert Rivera v. State (Gilbert Rivera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 3, 1999
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On October 25, 1999, we ordered appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction where his notice of appeal was due to be filed on August 1, 1999, was not filed until September 13, 1999, and no motion for extension of time was filed. Appellant has filed a document in this court indicating that he filed his notice of appeal late because he was hospitalized and did not have access to the law library. This explanation is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that a late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals' jurisdiction only if it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time).
Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilbert Rivera v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-rivera-v-state-texapp-1999.