Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central, LLC
This text of Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central, LLC (Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 121 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RALPH GILBERT, GLORIA GILBERT, : No. 358 MAL 2014 MICHELLE TORGERSON, EDWIN : TORGERSON, MELDA BITTORF, : BEVERLY COX, WILLIAM COX, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the KIMBERLY MILES, CLEA FOCKLER, : Order of the Superior Court JOHN FOCKLER, LINDA ECKERT, : SCOTT ECKERT, WILLIAM STRINE, : KENNY JASINSKI, DENNIS JASINSKI,: KATHRYN JASINSKI, JOSEPH : JASINSKI, PATRICIA UNVERZAGT, : MEGAN JACOBS, BARBARA : UNVERZAGT, DONNA PARR, JEFF : FODEL, WENDY FODEL, JENNIFER : JASINSKI, JOHN JASINSKI, JUDY : QUEITZSCH, JEAN FRY, RICK : MCSHERRY, JOHN FREESE, DONNA : LYNN FREESE, JEFF VAN VOORHIS, : SUSAN LEE FOX, TERRENCE : FANCHER AND DONNA FANCHER, : : Respondents : : v. : : SYNAGRO CENTRAL, LLC, SYNAGRO : MID-ATLANTIC, GEORGE PHILLIPS, : HILLTOP FARMS AND STEVE TROYER, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue is:
Did the Superior Court incorrectly interpret the Pennsylvania [RTFA] by requiring a jury trial to determine that the land application of biosolids falls within the Act’s definition of a “normal agricultural operation,” which was contrary to the Act and this Court’s precedent that statutes of repose and statutory interpretation present questions of law for resolution by courts, not juries?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-r-v-synagro-central-llc-pa-2014.