Gilbert Parsons v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Gilbert Parsons v. United States

250 F.2d 408, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 83

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1957

Docket13998_1

StatusPublished

This text of 250 F.2d 408 (Gilbert Parsons v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbert Parsons v. United States, 250 F.2d 408, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 83 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted on six of nine counts of an indictment for violation of the federal narcotic laws, 1 and acquitted on three counts. Court-appointed counsel has conscientiously presented all questions about which some contention reasonably could be made, but we find no error.

Affirmed.

1

. 68A Stat. 550 (1954), as amended, 26-U.S.C. § 4704(a) ; 68A Stat. 551 (1954), as amended, 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) ; 35-Stat. 614 (1909), as amended, 21 U.S.C. § 174 (Supp. IV, 1957), 21 U.S.C.A. §.- 174.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted on six of nine counts of an indictment for violation of the federal narcotic laws, 1 and acquitted on three counts. Court-appointed counsel has conscientiously presented all questions about which some contention reasonably could be made, but we find no error.

Affirmed.

1

. 68A Stat. 550 (1954), as amended, 26-U.S.C. § 4704(a) ; 68A Stat. 551 (1954), as amended, 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) ; 35-Stat. 614 (1909), as amended, 21 U.S.C. § 174 (Supp. IV, 1957), 21 U.S.C.A. §.- 174.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 F.2d 408, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-parsons-v-united-states-cadc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack