Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan
197 F. 315, 116 C.C.A. 661, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299
This text of 197 F. 315 (Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan, 197 F. 315, 116 C.C.A. 661, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299 (2d Cir. 1912).
Opinion
For the reasons fully set forth in Judge Hand’s opinion we think that, with the Albert patent in the prior art, the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention.
The case being determined by the conclusion of invalidity, we express no opinion upon the question of infringement.
The decree of the Circuit (now District) Court is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
197 F. 315, 116 C.C.A. 661, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-harris-co-v-watzelhan-ca2-1912.