Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan
197 F. 315, 116 C.C.A. 661, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299
Opinion
For the reasons fully set forth in Judge Hand’s opinion we think that, with the Albert patent in the prior art, the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention.
The case being determined by the conclusion of invalidity, we express no opinion upon the question of infringement.
The decree of the Circuit (now District) Court is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan, 197 F. 315, 116 C.C.A. 661, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1299 (2d Cir. 1912).
197 F. 315 (Gilbert, Harris & Co. v. Watzelhan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.