Gilbert Garza v. State
This text of Gilbert Garza v. State (Gilbert Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 10, 1999
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellant Gilbert Garza filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. On October 14, 1999, we denied the motion because our records reflect Garza is represented by appellate counsel, but counsel did not sign the motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Subsequently, counsel filed a statement concurring in the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we withdraw our October 14, 1999 order and grant the motion to dismiss. This appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilbert Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbert-garza-v-state-texapp-1999.