Gilbert F. Postelwait v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

365 F.2d 759, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5014
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 12, 1966·No. 8835·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a prisoner in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, appeals from an order dismissing his habeas corpus petition without a hearing. The essence of his contention is that after revocation of his parole and return to prison, he was entitled to have credited against his sentence the time during which he was on parole, because he was in constructive custody of the Attorney General of the United States. This same argument was rejected by this court in Weathers v. Willingham, 356 F.2d 421. Sentence can be served only by imprisonment or by unrevoked parole.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert F. Postelwait v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 365 F.2d 759, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5014 (10th Cir. 1966).

365 F.2d 759 (Gilbert F. Postelwait v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Warden-El Reno, Oklahoma Board of Parole
418 F. Supp. 894 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1976)
Harry B. Suggs v. Loren Daggett, Warden
522 F.2d 396 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
James J. Canavari v. G. v. Richardson
419 F.2d 1287 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
O'Callahan v. United States
293 F. Supp. 122 (D. Minnesota, 1968)
Young v. Director, U. S. Bureau of Prisons
263 F. Supp. 263 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)