Gilbank, Michelle v. Wood County DHS
Opinion
for the Western District of Wisconsin Civil Division
MICHELLE R GILBANK, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-601-jdp Plaintiffs, vs. NOTICE OF APPEAL WOOD COUNTY DHS, et al., Defendants.
Michelle R Gilbank, plaintiff, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from the final judgement entered on December 10th, 2021; and from all previous rulings in this action. Plaintiff is entitled to redress due to Constitutional violations of which she suffered injury. Plaintiff’s custody of her child and security in her home were violated without warrant. “Government officials are required to obtain prior judicial authorization before intruding on a parent’s custody of his or her child unless they possess information at the time of the seizure that establishes ‘reasonable cause to believe that the child is in imminent danger of serious bodily injury and that the scope of the intrusion is reasonably necessary to avert that specific injury.’” (Mabe v. San Benardino County DPSS, 2001, 9th Cir., 237 F.3d 1101) Plaintiff’s federal claims are not inextricably intertwined with a state-court judgment because the defendants’ challenged conduct—warrantless interference in child custody, warrantless removal from her home, and providing false and misleading testimony—occurred before any judicial involvement. The complaint alleges, at most, “an independent prior injury that the state court failed to remedy” and not an injury “caused by the state court judgment.” (Sykes, 837 F.3d at
742). Her federal claims could exist even without any state-court judgment. And for that reason, the “the injur[ies] complained of by [Plaintiff can] be separated from [the] state court judgment.” (Jakupovic, 850 F.3d at 903 (quoting Sykes, 837 F.3d at 742)). The Rooker-Feldman doctrine accordingly does not apply, and federal courts may exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s case. (Andrade v. City of Hammond, 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 20-1541) The issues at hand were refused to be heard in the Plaintiff’s juvenile county case, and the Defendants have not been defendants in any prior state action related to the Plaintiff. Dated: January 9, 2022 Respectfully submitted,
Michelle R Gilbank Michelle R Gilbank Email: michellegilbank@gmail.com Plaintiff / Appellant
I hereby certify that on January 9th, 2022, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing it to be served on Defendants’ counsels of record.
Michelle R Gilbank Michelle R Gilbank Email: michellegilbank@gmail.com Plaintiff / Appellant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilbank, Michelle v. Wood County DHS (Gilbank, Michelle v. Wood County DHS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.