Gilbane Building Co. v. Britton

D.C. Circuit

Gilbane Building Co. v. Britton

264 F.2d 574, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 101

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1959

DocketNo. 14641

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 F.2d 574 (Gilbane Building Co. v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilbane Building Co. v. Britton, 264 F.2d 574, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 101 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court entered summary judgment for defendants on a complaint which alleged that the defendant Deputy Commissioner, U. S. Department of Labor, erred in granting an award to defendant claimant under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act. D. C.Code § 36-501 (1951), incorporating by reference The Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 33, ch. 18 U.S.C.¹ The Deputy Commissioner granted the award on the basis of his finding of a permanent partial disability resulting from an injury the claimant sustained in 1955 in the course of his employment by appellant building company.

Appellants contend that the record as a whole does not support the findings of the Deputy Commissioner. The record discloses sufficient evidence to sustain the award and the order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The District Court entered summary judgment for defendants on a complaint which alleged that the defendant Deputy Commissioner, U. S. Department of Labor, erred in granting an award to defendant claimant under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act. D. C.Code § 36-501 (1951), incorporating by reference The Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 33, ch. 18 U.S.C.¹ The Deputy Commissioner granted the award on the basis of his finding of a permanent partial disability resulting from an injury the claimant sustained in 1955 in the course of his employment by appellant building company.

Appellants contend that the record as a whole does not support the findings of the Deputy Commissioner. The record discloses sufficient evidence to sustain the award and the order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 F.2d 574, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilbane-building-co-v-britton-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack