Gilardy v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Gilardy v. United States

787 F.2d 469, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24061

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1986

Docket84-2269

StatusPublished

This text of 787 F.2d 469 (Gilardy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilardy v. United States, 787 F.2d 469, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24061 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

787 F.2d 469

William H. GILARDY, Jr., Special Administrator of the Estate
of David Lee Thompson; Frank W. Thompson; Dorie
Thompson; and Kim M. Thompson,
Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellee.

No. 84-2269.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 15, 1986.

Donald L. Salem, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants.

Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, Phillip A. Berns, Atty., and Warren A. Schneider, Trial Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI