Gika v. Manchester Realty Associates
This text of 87 A.D.3d 675 (Gika v. Manchester Realty Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant Manchester Realty Associates (hereinafter Manchester) established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Manchester’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Rivera, J.E, Covello, Florio and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.3d 675, 928 N.Y.2d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gika-v-manchester-realty-associates-nyappdiv-2011.