GihanKader v. Shepherd

190 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 601, 2006 WL 1147649
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 2006
DocketED 86407
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W.3d 561 (GihanKader v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GihanKader v. Shepherd, 190 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 601, 2006 WL 1147649 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Shepherd appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Gihan Kader and enforcing their prenuptial agreement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finley v. State
190 S.W.3d 561 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.W.3d 561, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 601, 2006 WL 1147649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gihankader-v-shepherd-moctapp-2006.