Giglio v. Giglio

12 A.2d 878, 127 N.J. Eq. 342, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 619
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 25, 1940·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The wife in this case seeks separate maintenance and a return of some property, title to which is now in her husband. The appeal is from the Chancery decree dismissing the original and the amended petition filed by the wife.

We have examined the proofs, the finding of the learned advisory master and the decree, and conclude that the decree under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Woles-Keil, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giglio v. Giglio, 12 A.2d 878, 127 N.J. Eq. 342, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 619 (N.J. 1940).

12 A.2d 878 (Giglio v. Giglio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.