Gifford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Gifford v. State

1911 OK CR 418, 117 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 635, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 375

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-1237.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 418 (Gifford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gifford v. State, 1911 OK CR 418, 117 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 635, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 375 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 3rd day of May, 1911, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Washita county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. Appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. At the same time, in the same ease, judgment was pronounced against A. H. Sheppard for the same offense. Both parties prosecuted an appeal to this court. After the appeal was perfected, appellant A. P. Gifford moved the court to be permitted to withdraw his appeal, which motion is by the court sustained, and the appeal of the said A. P. Gifford is therefore dismissed, but said ease is continued in this court as to the appeal of A. II .Sheppard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 3rd day of May, 1911, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the county court of Washita county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. Appellant was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. At the same time, in the same ease, judgment was pronounced against A. H. Sheppard for the same offense. Both parties prosecuted an appeal to this court. After the appeal was perfected, appellant A. P. Gifford moved the court to be permitted to withdraw his appeal, which motion is by the court sustained, and the appeal of the said A. P. Gifford is therefore dismissed, but said ease is continued in this court as to the appeal of A. II .Sheppard.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 418, 117 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 635, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gifford-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.