Gifford v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation

364 A.2d 1275, 1976 Me. LEXIS 377
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*1276 PER CURIAM.

The above death action was premised on the negligence of the agents of the defendant in the maintenance of a highway barricade and warning signs alerting the motoring public of its presence.

Defendant filed an appropriate motion to dismiss asserting a) lack of consent by the State to bring the action, and b) the defense of sovereign immunity. The motion was granted without comment, from which ruling plaintiff has appealed.

In Davies v. City of Bath, 364 A.2d 1269, decided this date, we determined to abrogate the doctrine of sovereign immunity, but to apply the decision to that case and those causes of action which arise sixty days after the certification of Davies. Since this alleged cause of action arose prior to that date, the doctrine is applicable. The complaint was properly dismissed.

The entry is:

Appeal denied.

All Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gifford v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation, 364 A.2d 1275, 1976 Me. LEXIS 377 (Me. 1976).

364 A.2d 1275 (Gifford v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Collins
368 A.2d 1160 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)