Gifford v. Key Bank of ME
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 93-2063
FRANK P. GIFFORD, ET AL.,
Appellants,
v.
KEY BANK OF MAINE,
Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Frank Gifford and Elaine Gifford on brief pro se.
_____________ ______________
Jana S. Stabile and Michael S. Haenn on brief for appellee.
_______________ ________________
____________________
July 7, 1994
____________________
Per Curiam. Appellants, former chapter 7 debtors,
__________
appeal a district court order affirming a bankruptcy court
order dismissing appellants' second motion to reopen their
chapter 7 proceedings, this time for the purpose of
challenging appellee's right to enforce its real estate
mortgage against debtors' residence. Upon careful review, we
summarily affirm the dismissal order as appellants have
demonstrated no abuse of discretion.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.
________ ___
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gifford v. Key Bank of ME, (1st Cir. 1994).
Gifford v. Key Bank of ME (Gifford v. Key Bank of ME) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.