Gifford v. Babbott

1 How. Pr. 63
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 63 (Gifford v. Babbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gifford v. Babbott, 1 How. Pr. 63 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The excuse is sufficient for plaintiff to renew his stipulation.

Decision.—Motion granted unless plaintiff renew his stipulation to try at the next Oneida circuit, and pay costs of circuit up to notice of countermand, and ten dollars costs of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gifford-v-babbott-nysupct-1844.