Gifford Lumber Co. v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gifford Lumber Co. v. Johnson

577 S.W.3d 879

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106961

StatusPublished

This text of 577 S.W.3d 879 (Gifford Lumber Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gifford Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 577 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darin S. Johnson (Appellant) appeals the motion court's judgment granting Gifford *880Lumber Co., Inc.'s (Respondent) claim against him for money owed on an unpaid account. We have reviewed Appellant's brief¹ and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darin S. Johnson (Appellant) appeals the motion court's judgment granting Gifford *880Lumber Co., Inc.'s (Respondent) claim against him for money owed on an unpaid account. We have reviewed Appellant's brief¹ and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 S.W.3d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gifford-lumber-co-v-johnson-moctapp-2019.