Gifford Johnson III v. State

Opinion

Oi'l/'i Mr- ? r • C: £ Hl-IS

My C.g.ia-e »'5 fctfor^kLlI^Cgll 1&ldj+k-e J^c^>y\d (on +ke s«t*e. tLcrj^ )pno(4>rJ &{- 4lp Cortfl-chp frig I JTGnJcr'.flx A^. office IJ / fAg/ j-k^re are V/".«, JJ„/_ JJ

_(H • volumesj • thd ~£——rs&erf rJcr;-f)c*+'.ov\ )£ -/-Aqf /ivfnbff 7—j

X^ e'i\^-ef rcsef C^ofJ yvu f>(<>CL.[e -famish rv-C ^'-/-A 4-le, r&J-l- f^t f A-e +rc*Scr:ioh f-> my J-cCvhd fr/af wly.C.murt'**' IQCtOZHf. &hct i*f*r**+;*h 4/^ f/Wr ^/;hg r.^a\\ak\\Ay . T*f +l)( IS hoi He pr^^rr- yj^c^ /°/W^/g fr.'f-ofM rt-e rr-ec1~ praCeSS .jT -f-lgnK \/<}L<-f*r y<*sr -h\ we a*d fv^K £&nus£rJ ^e> Wr- -t-inely r-eSf&hS-e. ,

Ta^^/T/^ #*/* Glir*f_oC0t ZfJ^Jc^ZUP. •**/-7?l2£

F'RSTCoSfSF

^ J 6 2015 ,opHR/STOPHFR . n fcSORflPH! HOUSTON TK 773? [7342# Par*"! r\(±or\ U/TjT 14 APR 201S PM 5 1. jj

^jKcron ,T£. 7 7X^3

C<%rf o^/Wf^/j, ^W District 'HOUSTON 3d I han^'.o iff-eer

CHB1STOPHE* A sOJI

\CL££i

ZeW ^i| "7 ?00220&£99 .||..,l,i|i||lini|..,ll.||ii|iri|i|ii|i||i|i>iii|i"i"l'l'i'