Gifford D. Warner v. Zenith Steamship Corporation, Claimants-Appellees

First Circuit

Gifford D. Warner v. Zenith Steamship Corporation, Claimants-Appellees

213 F.2d 542, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3541

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJune 10, 1954

Docket4835

StatusPublished

This text of 213 F.2d 542 (Gifford D. Warner v. Zenith Steamship Corporation, Claimants-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gifford D. Warner v. Zenith Steamship Corporation, Claimants-Appellees, 213 F.2d 542, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3541 (1st Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

213 F.2d 542

Gifford D. WARNER, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
ZENITH STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al., Claimants-Appellees.

No. 4835.

United States Court of Appeals
First Circuit.

June 10, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; Charles Edward Wyzanski, Jr., District Judge.

Gifford D. Warner, Essex, Conn., pro se.

Thomas H. Walsh, Boston, Mass. (Leo F. Glynn, Boston, Mass., and Wilbur E. Dow, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for Zenith S.S. Corp.

Charles S. Bolster, Boston, Mass. (Bingham, Dana & Gould, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for Esso Standard Oil Co.

Joseph F. Dolan, Boston, Mass., John C. Crawley and Ezra G. Benedict Fox, New York City, on the brief of National Bulk Carriers, Inc., amici curiae.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed. Cuttyhunk Boat Lines v. The Pendleton, 119 F.Supp. 608, 1954 A.M.C. 123.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI