Giffen v. St. Clair Township
This text of 4 Watts & Serg. 327 (Giffen v. St. Clair Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Caldwell v. Thompson, (1 Rawle 360); Lyon v. Chalker, (2 Watts 14); and Graham v. Vandalore, (Ib. 131); are cases which originated before a justice of the peace, and in which the names of parties were transposed or changed to adapt the merits to legal form. What more was there to do here ? The defendant was sued, as a township, by the names and title of its overseers; and the counsel repaired the error of the justice in declaring against the township by its corporate name. It was the ordinary case of a misnomer corrected in the appellate court; and the rule of the decisions quoted, amply justifies it. The demurrer consequently ought to have been overruled.
Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Watts & Serg. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giffen-v-st-clair-township-pa-1842.