Giffen v. St. Clair Township

4 Watts & Serg. 327
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1842·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Caldwell v. Thompson, (1 Rawle 360); Lyon v. Chalker, (2 Watts 14); and Graham v. Vandalore, (Ib. 131); are cases which originated before a justice of the peace, and in which the names of parties were transposed or changed to adapt the merits to legal form. What more was there to do here ? The defendant was sued, as a township, by the names and title of its overseers; and the counsel repaired the error of the justice in declaring against the township by its corporate name. It was the ordinary case of a misnomer corrected in the appellate court; and the rule of the decisions quoted, amply justifies it. The demurrer consequently ought to have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giffen v. St. Clair Township, 4 Watts & Serg. 327 (Pa. 1842).

4 Watts & Serg. 327 (Giffen v. St. Clair Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lyon v. Chalker
2 Watts 14 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)