Giffen v. St. Clair Township

4 Watts & Serg. 327
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Watts & Serg. 327 (Giffen v. St. Clair Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giffen v. St. Clair Township, 4 Watts & Serg. 327 (Pa. 1842).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Caldwell v. Thompson, (1 Rawle 360); Lyon v. Chalker, (2 Watts 14); and Graham v. Vandalore, (Ib. 131); are cases which originated before a justice of the peace, and in which the names of parties were transposed or changed to adapt the merits to legal form. What more was there to do here ? The defendant was sued, as a township, by the names and title of its overseers; and the counsel repaired the error of the justice in declaring against the township by its corporate name. It was the ordinary case of a misnomer corrected in the appellate court; and the rule of the decisions quoted, amply justifies it. The demurrer consequently ought to have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyon v. Chalker
2 Watts 14 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Watts & Serg. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giffen-v-st-clair-township-pa-1842.