Giese v. State

773 So. 2d 128, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16657, 2000 WL 1854031
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2000·No. No. 4D99-115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for second degree murder. We hold that the prosecutor’s remarks fall within the wide latitude permitted in arguing to a jury during closing argument. Breedlove v. State, 413 So.2d 1 (Fla.1982), cert. den. sub nom Breedlove v. Florida, 459 U.S. 882, 103 S.Ct. 184, 74 L.Ed.2d 149 (1982).

Appellant correctly contends that the Florida Supreme Court has held the 1995 version of the sentencing guidelines, under which he was sentenced, to be unconstitutional. Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for a determination of whether resentencing is required pursuant to Heggs, Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and for resentencing if required.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giese v. State, 773 So. 2d 128, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16657, 2000 WL 1854031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 128 (Giese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newlon v. Missouri
459 U.S. 884 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Speed v. State
764 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Breedlove v. State
413 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Tison v. Arizona
459 U.S. 882 (Supreme Court, 1982)