Gierz v. Rus

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gierz v. Rus

205 Ill. App. 375

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 18, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,042·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error—when proper judgment cannot he entered on appeal in action on appeal hand. Where the evidence was not preserved in the record by bill of exceptions, held that there was no way of ascertaining the amount of damages, in an action to recover on an appeal bond, and proper judgment could not be entered on an appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error—when proper judgment cannot he entered on appeal in action on appeal hand. Where the evidence was not preserved in the record by bill of exceptions, held that there was no way of ascertaining the amount of damages, in an action to recover on an appeal bond, and proper judgment could not be entered on an appeal.

Gierz v. Rus, 205 Ill. App. 375 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

205 Ill. App. 375 (Gierz v. Rus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.