Gierz v. Rus

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gierz v. Rus

205 Ill. App. 375

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 18, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,042

StatusPublished

This text of 205 Ill. App. 375 (Gierz v. Rus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gierz v. Rus, 205 Ill. App. 375 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error—when proper judgment cannot he entered on appeal in action on appeal hand. Where the evidence was not preserved in the record by bill of exceptions, held that there was no way of ascertaining the amount of damages, in an action to recover on an appeal bond, and proper judgment could not be entered on an appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error—when proper judgment cannot he entered on appeal in action on appeal hand. Where the evidence was not preserved in the record by bill of exceptions, held that there was no way of ascertaining the amount of damages, in an action to recover on an appeal bond, and proper judgment could not be entered on an appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 Ill. App. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gierz-v-rus-illappct-1917.