Giersz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giersz v. Goord

11 A.D.3d 831, 783 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12690

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lament, J.), entered December 2, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent withholding good time allowance.

Fetitioner challenges a determination withholding good time allowance based upon his refusal to participate in two treatment programs. Inasmuch as petitioner was conditionally released from prison on September 14, 2004, this proceeding is now moot (see Matter of Eades v Duncan, 307 AD2d 503 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lament, J.), entered December 2, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent withholding good time allowance.

Fetitioner challenges a determination withholding good time allowance based upon his refusal to participate in two treatment programs. Inasmuch as petitioner was conditionally released from prison on September 14, 2004, this proceeding is now moot (see Matter of Eades v Duncan, 307 AD2d 503 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Giersz v. Goord, 11 A.D.3d 831, 783 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

11 A.D.3d 831 (Giersz v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related