Giersz v. Goord

11 A.D.3d 831, 783 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 831 (Giersz v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giersz v. Goord, 11 A.D.3d 831, 783 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lament, J.), entered December 2, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent withholding good time allowance.

Fetitioner challenges a determination withholding good time allowance based upon his refusal to participate in two treatment programs. Inasmuch as petitioner was conditionally released from prison on September 14, 2004, this proceeding is now moot (see Matter of Eades v Duncan, 307 AD2d 503 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mellerson v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 2192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Demarta v. Prack
85 A.D.3d 1475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 831, 783 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giersz-v-goord-nyappdiv-2004.