Gieringer v. Howell
This text of 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 439 (Gieringer v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error relies upon the cases of Columbus Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Dennull, 21 Ohio App. 363, and Casey, et al v. Gaffney, et al, 22 Ohio App., 73, for a reversal. However, in those cases there was no consent, to the judgment of confirmation and distribution, while in the instant case, plaintiff in error consented to the entry of confirmation and distribution. Therefore, the cases above cited do not apply. The rule is that a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, rendered by consent c-f the parties, will not be reversed on error. Jackson v. Jackson, 16 Ohio St., 163. See also: Galway v. Galway, 83 N. E. 154.
The judgment of the court of Common Pleas of Butler County is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 439, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gieringer-v-howell-ohioctapp-1930.