Gidor, M. v. Mangus, B.
This text of Gidor, M. v. Mangus, B. (Gidor, M. v. Mangus, B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MARY JOAN GIDOR, : No. 42 WAL 2024 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : BENJAMIN E. MANGUS D/B/A MANGUS : INSPECTIONS, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred by construing Section 7512 of the Home Inspection Law, 68 Pa.C.S. § 7512, as a statute of repose, which barred all claims raised in Petitioner’s amended complaint, as opposed to a statute of limitations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gidor, M. v. Mangus, B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gidor-m-v-mangus-b-pa-2024.