Giddings v. Crosby

24 Tex. 295
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Roberts, J.

As to the suit on the note, the court did not err, because the defence set up was an effort to enforce a lien in the District Court,- in a case that properly belonged to the jurisdiction of the County Court. The lien of the judgment, should have given precedence to the claim of the widow and children, for their allowance under the order of the County Court, standing in full force, and not satisfied.

Upon the same ground also, the court did not err in affirming the decree of the County Court, refusing to set apart the proceeds of this note to the payment of the judgment, which constituted a lien upon the land, for which the note was given.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giddings v. Crosby, 24 Tex. 295 (Tex. 1859).

24 Tex. 295 (Giddings v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newnom v. Hedeman
184 S.W. 298 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Champion v. Shumate
39 S.W. 128 (Texas Supreme Court, 1897)
Toullerton v. Manchke
32 S.W. 238 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Mabry v. Ward
50 Tex. 404 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)
Mayman v. Reviere
47 Tex. 357 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)
McLane v. Paschal
47 Tex. 365 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)
Cannon v. Bonner
38 Tex. 487 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)