Giddens v. Testa
This text of 21 N.E.3d 327 (Giddens v. Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2012-359. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.
Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Richard Walters, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of [1404]*1404permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 N.E.3d 327, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giddens-v-testa-ohio-2014.