Giddens v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Giddens v. State

103 S.E. 739, 25 Ga. App. 540, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 60

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 28, 1920

Docket11588

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 739 (Giddens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giddens v. State, 103 S.E. 739, 25 Ga. App. 540, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the other portions of the charge set out in that ground, contains no reversible error.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Hardy & Peavy, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 90 Ga. 691; 92- Ga. 463; 106 Ga. 368; 125 Ga. 11; 9 Ga. App. 291 (1); 10 Ga. App. 831; 12 Ga. App. 540; 1 Ga. App. 118; 2 Ga. App. 418; 7 Ga. App. 541 (6).

C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra,

cited: 7 Ga. App. 848; 125 Ga. 101.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI