Giddens v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Giddens v. State

103 S.E. 739, 25 Ga. App. 540, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 60

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 28, 1920·No. 11588·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the other portions of the charge set out in that ground, contains no reversible error.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Hardy & Peavy, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 90 Ga. 691; 92- Ga. 463; 106 Ga. 368; 125 Ga. 11; 9 Ga. App. 291 (1); 10 Ga. App. 831; 12 Ga. App. 540; 1 Ga. App. 118; 2 Ga. App. 418; 7 Ga. App. 541 (6).

C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra,

cited: 7 Ga. App. 848; 125 Ga. 101.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the other portions of the charge set out in that ground, contains no reversible error.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Hardy & Peavy, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 90 Ga. 691; 92- Ga. 463; 106 Ga. 368; 125 Ga. 11; 9 Ga. App. 291 (1); 10 Ga. App. 831; 12 Ga. App. 540; 1 Ga. App. 118; 2 Ga. App. 418; 7 Ga. App. 541 (6).

C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra,

cited: 7 Ga. App. 848; 125 Ga. 101.

Giddens v. State, 103 S.E. 739, 25 Ga. App. 540, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

103 S.E. 739 (Giddens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related