GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedFebruary 4, 2020
Docket3:18-cv-00463
StatusUnknown

This text of GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated (GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 GIC PRIVATE, LIMITED, Case No. 18-cv-00463-BEN-MSB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTIES 13 APPLE INC.; COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.; FIH MOBILE LTD.; HON HAI 14 v. PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.; 15 PEGATRON CORPORATION; AND WISTRON CORPORATION’S 16 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO 17 Defendant. SUPPLEMENT THE PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 71] 18

19 20 WHEREAS Section 3.5 of the Protective Order in this action (Docket No. 30- 21 1) states that its provisions are without prejudice to the right of any party to seek 22 further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify the 23 Protective Order; and, 24 WHEREAS Section 10.1 of the Protective Order states that its provisions 25 should not be construed as prohibiting a non-party from seeking additional 26 protections for its confidential materials; and 27 WHEREAS now before the Court is Non-Parties Apple Inc. (“Apple”), 1 Hai”), FIH Mobile Ltd. (“FIH”), Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron”), and Wistron 2 Corporation’s (“Wistron,” and collectively, the “CMs”) Assented-To Motion to 3 Supplement the Protective Order; 4 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the terms of the Protective 5 Order apply to “APPLE PROTECTED MATERIAL” and “CM PROTECTED 6 MATERIAL” (as defined below), except as modified below: 7 1. DEFINITIONS 8 1.1. “APPLE MATERIAL”: any Disclosure or Discovery Materials 9 produced by, deemed produced by, reproduced on behalf of, or with the consent of 10 Apple, or obtained from Apple witnesses. For such material, the Apple will be 11 deemed a “Producing Party” as that term is used here and in the Protective Order. 12 1.2. “CM MATERIAL”: any Disclosure or Discovery Materials originally 13 produced by, deemed produced by, reproduced on behalf of, or with the consent of 14 Compal, Hon Hai, FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron, or obtained from Compal, Hon Hai, 15 FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron witnesses. For such material, the respective CM will be 16 deemed a “Producing Party” as that term is used here and in the Protective Order. 17 1.3. “APPLE CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: any APPLE 18 MATERIAL previously designated by Apple as CONFIDENTIAL, APPLE 19 CONFIDENTIAL, SD CAL CONFIDENTIAL, or any variant of 20 “CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC 21 Litigation. 22 1.4. “APPLE HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 23 Information or Items: any APPLE MATERIAL previously designated by Apple as 24 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, APPLE HIGHLY 25 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, SD CAL HIGHLY 26 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 27 INFORMATION, or any variant of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC 1 1.5. “APPLE PROTECTED MATERIAL”: any APPLE CONFIDENTIAL 2 or APPLE HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information 3 or Items. 4 1.6. “CM CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: any CM MATERIAL 5 previously designated by Compal, Hon Hai, FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron as 6 CONFIDENTIAL, COMPAL CONFIDENTIAL, FOXCONN CONFIDENTIAL, 7 PEGATRON CONFIDENTIAL, WISTRON CONFIDENTIAL, SD CAL 8 CONFIDENTIAL, or any variant of “CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, 9 Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC Litigation. 10 1.7. “CM HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 11 Information or Items: any CM MATERIAL previously designated as HIGHLY 12 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, COMPAL HIGHLY 13 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, FOXCONN HIGHLY 14 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, PEGATRON HIGHLY 15 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, WISTRON HIGHLY 16 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, or any variant of “HIGHLY 17 CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC 18 Litigation. 19 1.8. “CM PROTECTED MATERIAL”: any CM CONFIDENTIAL or CM 20 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information or Items. 21 1.9. “Outside Counsel of Record”: attorneys who are not employees of a 22 Party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party in connection with 23 this Action and have entered an appearance on behalf of that Party in this Action, as 24 well as other attorneys or support staff employed by the same firm as one of the 25 attorneys who has entered an appearance on behalf of one of the Parties in this 26 Action, to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 27 Action. 1 2. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 2.1. Confidential Material. Except as modified herein, APPLE 3 CONFIDENTIAL and CM CONFIDENTIAL Information and Items shall be treated 4 in accordance with the provision of the Protective Order that govern the treatment of 5 CONFIDENTIAL Information and Items. 6 2.2. Disclosure of APPLE CONFIDENTIAL or CM CONFIDENTIAL 7 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing 8 by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any Information or Item 9 designated APPLE CONFIDENTIAL or CM CONFIDENTIAL only to: 10 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, 11 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record, and any copying or clerical 12 litigation support services working at the direction of such Outside Counsel of 13 Record or employees thereof (1) who do not provide commercial advice (as opposed 14 to legal advice) to the Receiving Party and (2) to whom it is reasonably necessary to 15 disclose the information for this Action; 16 (b) five (5) or fewer House Counsel or other agreed-upon Party 17 representatives identified and agreed upon between the Party, on one hand, and 18 Apple (for APPLE CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items) or Compal, Hon Hai, 19 FIH, Pegatron, and/or Wistron (for CM CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items 20 respectively) on the other hand, prior to any disclosure, (1) to whom disclosure is 21 reasonably necessary for this Action, (2) who are not involved in competitive 22 decision- making (as opposed to legal advice), as defined by U.S. Steel v. United 23 States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party, or a 24 competitor of a Party, relating to the cellular industry, and (3) who have signed the 25 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), as well as their 26 support staff to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, provided that such support 27 staff are not involved in competitive decision-making and have signed the 1 (c) experts (as defined in the Protective Order) retained by the 2 Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation 3 provided that (1) such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 4 Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (2) such Expert has no involvement in competitive 5 decision-making (as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 6 (Fed. Cir. 1984)) for the Receiving Party; (3) to the extent required by U.S. 7 government export control and economic sanctions laws, including the U.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gic-private-limited-v-qualcomm-incorporated-casd-2020.