Gibson v. Yaw

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Mario Gibson,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:22cv773

Lieutenant Lucy Yaw,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 27, 2024 (Doc. 21). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 21) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 21) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court