Gibson v. United States

83 F. Supp. 990, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2973
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia
DecidedApril 26, 1949
DocketCiv. A. Nos. 473-475
StatusPublished

This text of 83 F. Supp. 990 (Gibson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. United States, 83 F. Supp. 990, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2973 (S.D.W. Va. 1949).

Opinion

WATKINS, District Judge.

Pursuant .to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact.

1. On January 12, 1948, Herbert D. Gibson was driving a 1935 Ford Sedan in an easterly direction on U. -S. Route 60, about one mile west of Ba-rboursville, W. Va. Sergeant Richard H. Hite, a member of the United States Army, who was then attached to -the Huntington Recruiting Sub-Station, Huntington, W. Va., was approaching the Ford Sedan from the east. Hite was driving a 1942 Ford Sedan, owned by -the United States, and was then and there acting within the scope of his employment, and upon official business for the United States Army. As Hite approached the Gibson car, he reoklessly and negligently drove over onto the left or wrong side of -the road, across the center line of such highway into -the oncoming Ford Sedan driven by Gibson. Just before hitting the Gibson car, Hite recklessly and negligently, and at a high -and unlawful rate of speed, attempted to overtake and pass a taxicab driven by Joe C. Ronk, also traveling in a westerly direction. When the Army and Gibson cars collided head-on, -the Army car (owned by defendant) was thrown -against the taxicab driven by Ronk. Lawrence C. White was a passenger in the taxicab.

2. Gibson saw the Army car coming and turned his car to the right in an effort to avoid a head-on collision. Neither Herbert D. Gibson, Beulah Gibson, Joe C. Ronk nor White was guilty of contributory negli[992]*992gence. The accident occurred about three o’clock in the afternoon when it was raining and the road was wet. Both the Gibson car and the taxicab were proceeding in a ■lawful manner at a moderate -rate of speed. The negligence of Richard H. Hite was the ■sole and proximate cause of the accident and the following injuries to the following persons:

Beulah Gibson.

1. Beulah Gibson, age 47, was riding in the rear seat of the Ford Sedan automobile driven by her son, Herbert D. Gibson. She suffered a severe blow on the head, resulting in a mild concussion, and a hemo-tonia on the left forehead about the size of a walnut, rendering her unconscious.

2. She suffered a Colles fracture of the wrist which had to be put in a cast for about six weeks. Her wrist is still weak. The only possibility of permanent injury is the possible onset of post-traumatic arthritis to the wrist j oint. There is no evidence of such arthritis at this time.

3. She also suffered a hemotonia of the left shoulder and right ankle joint,.with no bone injury. She was admitted to the hospital on January 12, and discharged February 7. The left shoulder became frozen because of immobilization (commonly called bursitis with adhesions), making it necessary for her to re-enter the hospital on May 3, where she was put under anesthesia and the shoulder manipulated to remove the adhesions. She was again released from the hospital on May 8.

4. Because of such injuries she was unable to do her housework for about seven months. After returning from the hospital she was in bed at home for about three months, and for about two months longer was in bed about half the time. Except as mentioned above, her recovery is now complete. She incurred necessary hospital and medical expenses of $382.65.

The sum of $5,000 is just and fair compensation for all damages resulting to Beulah Gibson from such accident.

Herbert D. Gibson.

1. Herbert D. Gibson was driving the 1935 Ford Sedan automobile. His right knee struck the steering wheel, causing a laceration in his knee about three centimeters in length, with some tear of external cartilage. He was unable to work because of such injuries from January 12 to February 9. His necessary medical expenses were $32.50. His knee is now normal, but ■from past history of such injuries he may at some future time be troubled with it. It is similar to what is known as athlete’s knee.

2. The sum of $600 is just and fair compensation for all damages resulting to Herbert D. Gibson from such accident.

Joe .C. Ronk.

1. When the Ronk car was struck by the Army car, Ronk was twisted, turned and scooted out of his seat. He was 39 years of age and his health was previously good. He had experienced no trouble with his back prior .to this accident. He was a first-class mechanic and had a repair garage of his own, but also managed a taxicab company for his mother. His average monthly earnings for the year 1947 were $350-$400. ■After the accident he drove to State Police Headquarters, a distance of about one mile from the scene of the accident, then returned to the scene of the accident and ■stayed there for some time. That night he did not sleep well because of pains in his back. The next morning he went to see Dr. Richmond, at Milton, W. Va., who gave him a few pain pills and some liniment. Later he went to see Dr. Neese, a chiropractor, who gave him several treatments for his back. ' Later he went to Dr. Silver, at Milton, who recommended that he go to see Dr. Jones, an Orthopedic surgeon. He was first examined by Dr. Jones on January 22. This examination included a 'thorough clinical and physical examination and the taking of X-ray pictures. Dr. Jones found quite a bit of muscle spasm in the lower ■back and his diagnosis was that Ronk had •a fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra on the left with very slight displacement. Upon his recommendation, Ronk entered the hospital on January 25 where he remained for 74 days. A plaster cast was placed on him from his hips up to his arms. The cast was removed March 16. After [993]*993the cast was removed Dr. Jones had him wear a1 Taylor back brace. He later returned to the hospital for physiotherapy treatments. All of this hospitalization and treatment was directed by Dr. Scott, an able and reputable orthopedic surgeon, .for what he believed to be a fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra.

2. Shortly before trial many additional X-rays were taken by other physicians, who found no evidence of any such fracture in either the X-rays taken by Dr. Jones or the new X-rays taken by them. Dr. Francis Scott, an orthopedic surgeon, and Dr. Cole D. Genge, an X-ray specialist, were unable to find any such fracture. The court appointed Dr. Henry Edstrom, a disinterested X-ray specialist, to examine all the X-rays, and he, too, was unable to find any such fracture. From this evidence I find that no fracture or dislocation in any part of the spine or pelvis occurred. However, I do find from the evidence that he suffered serious damage to the soft tissues, including muscles and ligaments in the area of the lower back. Such damage or injury would riot be shown by any of the X-rays.

3. After taking X-rays and making a thorough physical and clinical examination, Dr. Jones recommended certain treatment which he reasonably believed to be necessary. Ronk, as a reasonable person, accepted the diagnosis and opinion of Dr. Jones, an expert in this field, as to the nature and cause of his injuries. As a result of this he incurred hospital and doctor bills in the amount of $1,168.50 in an effort to be cured of his injuries, and lost several months of time from his work. I find that Ronk did sustain severe injury to his back and that the treatment given him by Dr. Jones was reasonably necessary to cure such injuries. As p result of this thorough treatment, I find that he has now recovered, and that there is no permanent injury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 921
28 U.S.C. § 921

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 F. Supp. 990, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-united-states-wvsd-1949.