Gibson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Gibson v. United States

522 F. App'x 193

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. 13-1211·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thor K. Gibson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibson v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-00067-IMK-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[194] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thor K. Gibson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Gibson v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-00067-IMK-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[194] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Gibson v. United States, 522 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

522 F. App'x 193 (Gibson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.