Gibson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Gibson v. United States

211 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 4, 2007·No. No. 06-7392·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice Gibson’s motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gibson v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00461-WLO (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice Gibson’s motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gibson v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00461-WLO (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gibson v. United States, 211 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

211 F. App'x 213 (Gibson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.