Gibson v. State
This text of 257 S.W. 1101 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment charges forgery. Appellant made application requesting the jury to recommend a suspension of his sentence in the event of his conviction. The verdict of the jury pronounced him guilty, fixing his punishment at two years in the penitentiary, and recommended that sentence be suspended. The judgment is in accord therewith, and suspends the sentence during the good behavior of appellant. Notwithstanding this he is seeking to have this court review his case. There is no final judgment from which an appeal may be prosecuted. Bierman v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 284, 164 S. W. Rep., 840; Thomas v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 153, 219 S. W. Rep., 1100.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 S.W. 1101, 96 Tex. Crim. 428, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-texcrimapp-1924.