Gibson v. State

536 S.W.2d 506, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2764
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1976·No. No. 10165·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Appellant Harrison Gibson and Frank W. Maupin were convicted in Greene County of attempted second degree burglary. They appealed their convictions and their appeal is pending in this Court in Case No. 9992.1

Prior to the filing of the trial transcript in No. 9992 the appellant filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. Following an eviden-tiary hearing the trial court denied appellant relief and this appeal followed. The respondent has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, citing Rule 27.26(b)(2), which is as follows:

“A motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence cannot be maintained white an appeal from the conviction and sentence is pending or during the time within which an appeal may be perfected.” (emphasis added)

As noted, appellant’s direct appeal is currently pending in this Court. Appellant’s motion to vacate discloses on its face he had an appeal pending at the time the motion was filed. The trial court would have been warranted in summarily dismissing the motion by reason of the provision of Rule 27.26 as above set forth.

Respondent’s motion is sustained and the appeal'is dismissed.

All concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. State, 536 S.W.2d 506, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2764 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976).

536 S.W.2d 506 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Meeks
635 S.W.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1982)
Riley v. State
588 S.W.2d 738 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Faught v. State
539 S.W.2d 750 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)