Gibson v. State
This text of 155 S.E. 922 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Tlie court did not err in refusing to allow a witness to testify as set out in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial.
2. The court did not err in charging the jury that “When witnesses appear and testify they are presumed to speak the truth and are to be believed unless impeached in some manner known to the law or otherwise discredited in the minds of the jury.” Gillespie v. State, 37 Ga. App. 507 (140 S. E. 791) ; Hamilton v. State, 143 Ga. 265 (5) (84 S. E. 583).
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, the trial judge approved it, and properly overruled the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 S.E. 922, 42 Ga. App. 285, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-gactapp-1930.