Gibson v. State

107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 175, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 760
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1921
Docket12352
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 599 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. State, 107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 175, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The special ground of the motion for a new trial, not having been unconditionally approved by the trial judge, cannot be considered by this court.

2. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, the trial judge has approved it, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Hammond Johnson, for plaintiff in error. J. G. Collins, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
142 S.E. 202 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Murray v. State
118 S.E. 62 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Wyche v. State
114 S.E. 586 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 175, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-gactapp-1921.