Gibson v. State

88 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 832, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 968
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 21, 1916
Docket7342
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 713 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. State, 88 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 832, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 968 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

There was no request by the plaintiff in error that the charge of the court be transmitted to this court for inspection; and, in the absence of the entire charge, there does not appear to be any material error in the excerpts therefrom complained of. See Mixon v. State, 15 Ga. App. 252 (3) (82 S. E. 935). The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Polk county— Judge John K. Davis. ^ February 25, 1916. Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mixon v. State
82 S.E. 935 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 832, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-gactapp-1916.