Gibson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gibson v. State

88 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 832, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 968

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gibson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Ga. App. 67 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 21, 1916·No. 7342·Published

Opinion

Broyles, J.

There was no request by the plaintiff in error that the charge of the court be transmitted to this court for inspection; and, in the absence of the entire charge, there does not appear to be any material error in the excerpts therefrom complained of. See Mixon v. State, 15 Ga. App. 252 (3) (82 S. E. 935). The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Polk county— Judge John K. Davis. ^ February 25, 1916.

Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

There was no request by the plaintiff in error that the charge of the court be transmitted to this court for inspection; and, in the absence of the entire charge, there does not appear to be any material error in the excerpts therefrom complained of. See Mixon v. State, 15 Ga. App. 252 (3) (82 S. E. 935). The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Polk county— Judge John K. Davis. ^ February 25, 1916.

Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Gibson v. State, 88 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 832, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 968 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

88 S.E. 713 (Gibson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related