Gibson v. State
810 So. 2d 1008, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2002 WL 272275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-90
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 810 So. 2d 1008 (Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gibson v. State, 810 So. 2d 1008, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2002 WL 272275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So.2d 348 (Fla.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aponte v. State
810 So. 2d 1008 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1008, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2002 WL 272275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.