Gibson v. Simmons

19 A. 486, 134 Pa. 189, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 686
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 7, 1890·No. No. 110·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an appeal from the order of the court below opening the judgment and staying the execution. The judgment was entered upon a scire facias to revive. It is almost unnecessary to say that no appeal lies in such case. The opening of such a judgment rests in the sound discretion of the court below. The act of 1877, allowing appeals from the order of the Common Pleas opening a judgment, applies only to judgments entered by virtue of a warrant of attorney or upon a judgment note. In Jenkintown N. Bank’s App., 124 Pa. 837, the execution was not set aside; it was merely stayed. The [191]*191authorities cited in regard to the setting aside of an execution do not apply.

Order affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson v. Simmons, 19 A. 486, 134 Pa. 189, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 686 (Pa. 1890).

19 A. 486 (Gibson v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Augustine v. Wolf
29 Pa. Super. 336 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co.
23 A. 335 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1892)