Gibson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gibson v. Selsky

244 A.D.2d 739, 664 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 739 (Gibson v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gibson v. Selsky, 244 A.D.2d 739, 664 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from making threats, engaging in violent conduct, possessing prison contraband, engaging in harassment, refusing to obey a direct order, creating a disturbance and participating in a demonstration. Substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner’s guilt. Included in the evidence presented against petitioner were three detailed misbehavior reports written by correction officers who were eyewitnesses to the misconduct in question, i.e., petitioner became violent when, in the context of a nonsmoking area of the visitors’ room, he was ordered to surrender his cigarettes. Petitioner proceeded to assault the correction officers, both verbally and physically, and it ultimately took five correction officers to subdue him. The testimony given by correction officers who were witnesses to the events in question was consistent with the misbehavior reports. On this record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative determination (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Williams v Goord, 242 AD2d 842, 842-843). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from making threats, engaging in violent conduct, possessing prison contraband, engaging in harassment, refusing to obey a direct order, creating a disturbance and participating in a demonstration. Substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner’s guilt. Included in the evidence presented against petitioner were three detailed misbehavior reports written by correction officers who were eyewitnesses to the misconduct in question, i.e., petitioner became violent when, in the context of a nonsmoking area of the visitors’ room, he was ordered to surrender his cigarettes. Petitioner proceeded to assault the correction officers, both verbally and physically, and it ultimately took five correction officers to subdue him. The testimony given by correction officers who were witnesses to the events in question was consistent with the misbehavior reports. On this record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative determination (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Williams v Goord, 242 AD2d 842, 842-843). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 739, 664 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-selsky-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack